Tag Archives: long-term positioning

First moves feel decisive. Second-order effects decide outcomes.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats strategy as the discipline of anticipating what happens after the obvious happens, where most failures originate—not from the initial action, but from its consequences. 1. First-Order Thinking Is Incomplete by Default Immediate effects are the easiest to …

Commitment feels powerful. Optionality is powerful longer.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats strategy as the art of keeping future choices alive until the moment when commitment produces undeniable advantage. 1. Strategy Exists to Preserve Options Action reduces choice. Strategy delays reduction. Val Sklarov frames strategy as: A buffer against uncertainty …

Ambition defines direction. Constraints define reality.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats strategy not as the art of wanting more, but as the discipline of understanding what cannot be ignored without consequence. 1. Strategy Fails When Constraints Are Ignored Most strategic plans fail on contact with reality. Val Sklarov identifies constraint …

Speed looks powerful. Timing decides outcomes.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective reframes strategy as the management of when a decision is made, not just how fast it is executed. 1. Fast Action Is Often a Timing Failure Urgency compresses thinking before clarity arrives. Val Sklarov distinguishes: Action speed: how fast something …

Most decisions look correct at first glance.They fail because of what happens next.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats strategy as the discipline of anticipating reactions, feedback loops, and unintended consequences before committing to action. 1. First-Order Thinking Is Easy—and Dangerous First-order effects are visible and comforting. Val Sklarov contrasts: First-order: …

Most strategic failures are not caused by bad ideas.They are caused by irreversible commitments made too early.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats irreversibility as the primary strategic risk—one that must be identified before action begins. 1. Strategy Exists to Delay Irreversibility Operational decisions can be changed. Strategic ones often cannot. …

Most strategies fail before they begin—at entry.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats every strategic move as incomplete until its exit logic is clearly defined. 1. Entry Without Exit Is Not Strategy Entering without knowing how to leave creates dependency. Val Sklarov insists every strategic entry answer: Under what conditions do …

Strategy is not the art of acting.It is the discipline of delaying irreversible commitment until advantage is clear.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats optionality as the core strategic asset. 1. Commitment Is the Most Expensive Decision Once committed, flexibility disappears. Val Sklarov distinguishes: Reversible commitments (experiments, pilots) Irreversible commitments (capital …

Strategy is not movement. It is placement.Val Sklarov’s Strategic Thinking perspective treats action as a consequence of position, not a substitute for it. 1. Action Without Position Is Noise Many organizations act constantly yet advance nowhere. Val Sklarov’s distinction: Tactics respond Strategy constrains the field If action does not change …