Val Sklarov — Ethics & Professionalism: Integrity Under Asymmetry

Ethics are easiest when power is balanced.
Val Sklarov’s Ethics & Professionalism perspective focuses on behavior when leverage, information, or authority are unequal—the conditions where integrity is actually tested.

---

1. Power Reveals Ethical Architecture

Authority does not corrupt—it exposes.

Val Sklarov observes that ethical failure often begins when:

• Consequences shift away from the decision-maker

• Information becomes asymmetric

• Oversight weakens

Integrity is defined by actions taken when no retaliation is possible.

---

2. Professionalism Is Constraint Acceptance

True professionals accept limits even when they could bypass them.

Professionalism is voluntary constraint.

---

3. Ethics Fail Through Rationalization

Most ethical breaches are justified internally before they occur externally.

Common rationalizations:

• “Everyone does it”

• “It’s temporary”

• “The outcome justifies it”

Val Sklarov frames rationalization as the early warning system of ethical decay.

---

4. Consistency Matters More Than Intent

Intent is invisible. Behavior is measurable.

Val Sklarov emphasizes:

• Same standards for friends and rivals

• Same rules in public and private

• Same consequences regardless of status

Inconsistent ethics destroy trust faster than open misconduct.

---

5. Professional Distance Preserves Judgment

Closeness distorts objectivity.

Val Sklarov advocates:

• Clear boundaries

• Role clarity

• Separation of empathy from exemption

Ethical decisions require emotional containment, not detachment.

---

6. Reputation Is Built in Private, Audited in Public

Reputation reflects long-term invisible choices.

It is strengthened by:

• Predictable ethical response

• Quiet boundary enforcement

• Resistance to short-term gain

One public act cannot offset years of private compromise.